Neil's Spiel

"I like Santa"

  Home :: Contact :: Syndication  :: Login
  222 Posts :: 0 Stories :: 341 Comments :: 22 Trackbacks

Archives

Post Categories

Image Galleries

Useful Links

Worth Reading

Friday, February 05, 2010 #

'nuff said

Photobucket
posted @ 11:55 PM | Feedback (3)

Saturday, January 16, 2010 #

I've been kinda dumbfounded by some people's reaction to the aid pouring into Haiti. "Why should we help them when we have problems back here?" is the typical refrain. This reaction to me is more than a little disturbing. I mean, I think I understand the root of it. I think people see millions of dollars going overseas all the time and get angry. And some of the time, hell I'd venture to say most of the time, that anger is warranted. When the United States sends money to a corrupt political infrastructure and we know that almost none of that money will make it to the people of that country, there's cause to be angry. In cases like that we're simply propping up corrupt or dysfunctional political apparatus to get whatever benefit we think we might get. I understand why people would get angry at that. I sure do.


But this situation is not analogous to others in which we're simply propping up political systems to get what we want. In the case of Haiti, there *is* no political infrastructure. There *is* no corrupt government. The country of Haiti and specifically the city of Port-au-Prince is annihilated. There is nothing there but anarchy and people attempting to survive. Estimates put the death toll (which is admittedly not accurate at this point) up around 100,000 people. That's 1% of Haiti's population. If we apply the same percentage to the United States, that's analogous to the entire city of Chicago being destroyed with no survivors. Not one. In fact, percentage-wise less people would die if every person in Chicago was dead than would die in Haiti if the 100,000 count holds.


This is a true to God humanitarian disaster. If you believe we are morally obligated to fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (which I do), you can not possibly believe that we are not morally obligated to help Haiti. If there is anything good the United States stands for, we must help Haiti. I could give a rats ass about the international community or what other countries think of the United States. I believe it's our moral obligation to help rebuild order so that food and medical supplies and personnel can actually help. This is death and destruction on an enormous scale and if we count ourselves as human, we should help.


But just in case you're not buying the moral obligation bit, we at least owe them SOME help. Haiti was only the second country in the Western Hemisphere to throw of the yoke of European colonialism and establish their own republic (three guesses as to who the first was). Haiti is the first republic to be established by blacks. Who cares right? Well, you see Haiti fought their revolution against the French. The slaves of the French that worked on the sugar plantations and provided an enormous portion of the Caribbean sugar revenues into French coffers rose up and fought not only for independence of their country but freedom from the hell of slavery (and by the by Pat Robertson, how on earth can you even make a deal with the devil when the purpose of your deal is to throw off the oppression of slavery which is essentially itself a fruit of "the devil"? (if you believe that sort of thing)). They were successful and in doing so broke Napoleons desire for Empire in the West. Without the sugar revenues, he couldn't afford to build France's empire in North America and with war looming between France and England, it was pointless to hold onto that territory. The Haitian revolution led directly to the Louisianan purchase. You know...that little purchase where the US not only acquired the strategically important shipping port of New Orleans but also oh...doubled the size of the United States ensuring our eventual spread to the West coast and our present status as a superpower. Not to mention removing France as a eventual competitor for resources on this continent (i.e. eventual adversary in war).


The US exists in it's present state because of Haiti. So donate your fucking $10 already.

posted @ 1:51 AM | Feedback (1)

Thursday, July 23, 2009 #

Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince is a good movie.  Heck, it’s even a great movie to the extent that it echoes what will surely be one of the most recognized accomplishments in fiction for the next 60 years if not more.  To dismiss Harry Potter as “kids stuff” is to entirely miss the importance of story and why it matters to humans.  To quote G.K. Chesterton, “Literature is luxury; fiction is a necessity”.


 

If you have not read the books or seen the movie, please stop reading here because I’m going to talk about the big ‘reveal’ at the end of this book/movie.

 

This second to last book in the series is essentially Harry (and the audience as well) coming the to deep realization that he will have to fight Voldemort, and as in all true Western Hero lit, he will have to fight him alone.  In the battle at the end of Order of the Phoenix, Harry faces a fully prepared Voldemort for the first time.  Obviously they had fought in previous books/films, but it’s in Order where Voldemort has recuperated to his full strength, gathered his full compliment of minions and executed a well thought out plan to lure out Harry and kill him.  Although Harry does defeat him, he does so by small margin and it’s Dumbledore, not Harry that physically frustrates and blocks Voldemort’s attacks (in what is probably the coolest magic battle ever put to film IMO).  It’s Dumbledore that leans down next to Harry and encourages him by telling him he is stronger than Voldemort.  In short here as well as in Goblet of Fire when Harry is first confronted with Voldemort’s fully physical form, he is no match for The Dark Lord.  He needs the support and help of those he loves and who love him.

 

In Half-Blood Prince, we are shown inch by inch that Dumbledore, the central father figure in Harry’s life and the person he has always counted on for protection in one form or another may also be too weak to the task of facing Voldemort.   Dumbledore’s hand is rotting away from an attempt to destroy a Horcrux and when he takes Harry to the location of another lost Horcrux with the intent to take it and destroy it, we see Dumbledore weep and beg to be spared his lot as he drinks the evil liquid that protects the device.  Only briefly do we catch a glimpse of Dumbledore’s real power.

 

So what the series has established up to this point is this: Dumbledore is Harry’s confidant, adviser, friend, father figure and protector.  We’ve also established that Dumbledore is extremely powerful, more powerful that we ever suspected at the beginning of the story and probably marginally more powerful that Voldemort himself.  He is if not the greatest, one of the greatest wizards of his age.  A fact underscored by Voldemort’s repeated attempts to kill, mame or otherwise remove Dumbledore from the picture.  This suitably raises the stakes for Harry.  How can he hope to defeat someone that Dumbledore can only hold off by the slimmest of margins?

 

So with the stakes suitably raised, we know that it’s time for Harry to have his one last protection stripped away.  It’s time to set the stage for the final confrontation between Harry and Voldemort.  It’s time for Dumbledore to die.

 

Based on Dumbledore’s importance to Harry, to the wizarding world at large and to us, the readers/audience, Dumbledore dying should be (and is in the books) a cataclysmic event.  It should not only shock us, but we should get a chance to grieve along with the Harry, Hermione and Ron and the rest, a character that’s become an important part of our lives as we follow the story.

 

I said in the beginning that Half Blood Prince is a good, even great movie and it is.  But some of the choices at the end are so absurd and unreal that it does an otherwise great movie a huge disservice.

 

In the book, Harry is paralyzed by Dumbledore before Dumbledore’s murder.  He lies in agony, completely unable to take action to save the man that is at the center of his life.  Harry as a person would HAVE to be constrained this way otherwise, as his actions in other books have demonstrated, he surely would have died trying to stop Dumbledore’s death.  It’s absolutely antithetical to who we know Harry to be to have him just sit by quietly with a simple “shhhh” form Snape as Snape marches up the stairs and kills his father figure.  It makes no sense.  None.  Just typing it out makes me laugh.  If someone had verbally explained this ending to me, I would have laughed saying there’s no way the filmmakers would do something like that.  Here is what the book says of Harry:

 

A jet of green light shot from the end of Snape’s wand and hit Dumbledore squarely in the chest.  Harry’s sreams of horror never left him; silent and unmoving, he was forced to watch as Dumbledore was blasted into the air.  For a split second, he seemed to hang suspended beneath the shining skull, and then he fell slowly backward, like a great rag doll, over the battlements and out of sight.”

 

And although this may be technically correctly represented on the screen, Harry’s paralysis has nothing to do with a spell as in the book.  Harry, the self-sacrificing, loving, act first ask questions later hero of the series sits idly by as the most important man in his life is murdered, stopped by nothing more than a “shhh”.  Stupid, stupid, stupid.

 

But perhaps even worse (although not by much) is the horrid substitution of a full funeral scene for some goofy pretense of one where all the kids and professors raise their wands in tribute to Dumbledore.  Again, this is the death of one of the most important men of his time.  Something akin to Benjamin Franklin or Abraham Lincoln dying in our world.  It’s also the death of arguably the most important person in Harry’s life.  Inarguably he is a character that casts a huge sphere of influence across the entire 7 book series for us, the readers.  If you go back and read the funeral chapter from Half-Blood Prince, I defy anyone to tell me that putting this chapter (even a shortened version of it to account for the film medium) into the movie wouldn’t have made it better.  It would have given some type of closure to the characters, brought home the fact that Harry is truly alone and unprotected now and brought the audience to an emotional height.  As it is, Dumbledore, hero of his age, flops to the ground in a heap and we all raise our wands like we’re at a Poison concert and Every Rose Has It's Thorn is playing.  Thanks.

 

I’m sure that came across pretty harsh but I have to end by saying that the film is good.  In fact, I’m going to go see it again with my daughter today.  It’s just so damned frustrating when something as important as Dumbledore’s death is treated with the intensity of ordering a bowl of oatmeal.

posted @ 3:00 PM | Feedback (2)

Sunday, March 29, 2009 #

I have a lot of wireless devices. Our Tivo, Apple TV, PS3, Wii and XBOX all connected wirelessly. This is in addition to my wife's laptop, our phones and the kid's PC. All told, there is a lot of wireless traffic flying around the Hetzel residence. I had been using an Apple Time Capsule which has a Wireless N router included in it, but I don't think that Apple designed it to have that many devices connected at once. As a result, all wireless traffic was very, very slow. Poor Trudy was pulling her hair out every time she was online (which is all the time). If you see a bald lady muttering about 17 more days know that the balding is partially my fault for not fixing the speed problem sooner :)

 Because the Time Capsule was soooo slooooow, I decided to pick up a Linksys WRT601N. In addition to the Gigabit switch, it has two, simultaneous N radio bands and was essentially billed as exactly what I wanted. I'm happy to report that this router absolutely SCREAMS in terms of speed. I'm very happy with it. I can now watch HD streaming video on my phone while my wife works, my son plays WoW and my daughter plays the Wii. Everything moves at a much increased clip. Even Apple TV is much, much faster.

However, getting to this state of wireless bliss was a rough road.

When I was at Best Buy yesterday, I saw that they had marked down the model I wanted from $200 to $169. There was also an open box item they were selling for $149. I decided to take a chance on the open box item assuming (as the representative assured me) that the return was simply due to the previous owner not knowing how to set it up. Well, I've set up plenty of routers so I figured it worth the shot. I got home, cracked open the box and followed the "LELA" instructions to the letter. Once the configuration was complete, the software informed me that the router could not detect an internet connection (this despite the face that I could see the cable modem and router lights blinking in unison when they were connected.)

I tried looping the Internet port to one of the input ports and checking to see if the router was picking up an IP. It was (127.0.0.1). I tried configuring it many different ways and it simply would not talk to the cable modem and pick up the IP address from COX. Frustrated, I decided it must be a hardware issue and returned to Best Buy. There I haggled with the employees and explained that I should not have to pay the extra $20 (the cost for a new router vs. the open box one I bought) for the privilege of doing their testing job for them. Eventually they relented and let me grab a new version of the same model for the mark down price.

I rushed back home, plugged it all in again and got the same result. Ugh. Now the troubleshooting began in earnest. I searched and found this linkwhich told me that I had to use MAC cloning in order to use the router. The instructions said that I had to use the MAC address of my PC, but that made no sense since it's the MAC address of the cable modem that should be cloned. I followed the instructions using the MAC of the cable modem and still no joy. I even tried the MAC of my machine just for fun and of course it didn't work. Frustrated, I engaged Linksys support. They were friendly and helpful, but they too seemed to be taking stabs in the dark. I tried each of their suggestions to no avail and while waiting for their responses, I searched the internet and found that a lot of people were suffering the same issues as me and not getting anywhere...even with Linksys support.

Hence the purpose of this post.

I decided I would try one more stab in the dark before giving up and returning the router to Best Buy. I stole the MAC address of my previous router, and entered it in the configuration screen for MAC Cloning on the WRT610N's web config interface. Suddenly everything worked peachy. Don't ask me how using a MAC address of a device that isn't even on the network counts as "cloning", but it did and now we're good. Of course I still have some hurdles to overcome. I want to hook the Time Capsule up to the existing network so I can at least use it as a disk for Time Machine. But for now (and since I use JungleDisk), I'm quite pleased with speed boost. The speed is worth the money, but Linksys really needs to work on the configuration of the router...it's buggy as heck.

posted @ 11:27 AM | Feedback (5)

Wednesday, February 18, 2009 #

This is a shout out to Staci Snider in Parkersburg, West "by God" Virginia.  Faithful reader of NeilHetzel.com...even when there was nothing to read.  Thanks!
posted @ 10:23 AM | Feedback (2)